The Great Dangers of
Mercury Amalgam Fillings
Scientifically Proven Facts
About Dental Amalgam (Mercury Fillings)
(Numbers in brackets refer to references at the bottom of this article)
Dental Amalgam contains about 50% Mercury.
Mercury has been scientifically demonstrated to be more toxic than Lead,
Cadmium or even Arsenic.
Mercury leaves dental amalgam continuously throughout the lifetime of the filling.
Mercury vapour is the main way that mercury comes out of amalgam. (31)
Mercury vapour is absorbed at a rate of 80% through the lungs into the arterial blood (31, 55)
Mercury kills cells.
There is NO harmless level of Mercury Vapour Exposure (63)
Mercury from mercury fillings binds to sulphydryl groups. These exist in almost every enzymatic process in the body. Mercury from amalgam has the potential to disturb all metabolic processes (25, 33, 60)
Mercury from amalgam is transported freely via the blood (19, 34, 35).
Mercury vapour is absorbed directly into the brain (34, 55a)
Mercury from amalgam will result in a slow build up of mercury in body tissues (20, 26, 34)
Mercury crosses the blood brain barrier (34, 55a)
Mercury is implicated in Alzheimer’s Disease (67, 68)
Mercury from amalgam is stored in the foetus and infant before the mother (20, 61) (Could this be part of the reason for children getting cancer?).
Mercury from amalgam is stored in the breast milk and the foetus up to 8 times more than the mother’s tissues (18, 19)
Mercury crosses the placenta (18, 31)
Mercury crosses into breast milk (18, 31, 61)
Mercury will severely reduce reproductive function (2, 3, 4, 20, 22, 24, 31, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 49)
Mercury rapidly depletes the immune system (27, 34, 35, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 60)
Mercury will induce a number of Auto Immune Diseases (27, 34, 35, 42,43, 44, 60)
Mercury will cause an increase in number and severity of all allergies (1, 34, 60)
Mercury from amalgam is stored principally in the kidneys, liver and brain (1, 20, 31)
Mercury from amalgam causes kidney damage (shown in animal experiments) (59)
Mercury from amalgam causes a 50% reduction in Kidney filtration, as shown in a study of sheep after amalgam placement (59)
After chewing, Mercury vapour levels will remain raised for at least another 90 minutes (1, 15, 16, 18, 47)
Mercury from amalgam will migrate through the tooth (25, 27, 30)
This rate of migration is increased if a gold crown is placed over a tooth filled with amalgam (27, 30)
Teeth are living tissues and are a part of our bodies.
Teeth have a massive communication via blood, lymph and nerves with the rest of the body (34)
Mercury from amalgam is absorbed into the body at a rate of 3 to 17 mcg / day (WHO 1991 Criteria 118)
Mercury is transported along nerve fibres (33,34, 50)
Mercury form amalgam may be stored in every cell in the body. Each area affected will produce its own set of symptoms ( See “The Real Causes of Pain & Disease “)
Mercury binds to haemoglobin in the red blood cell thus reducing oxygen carrying capacity (1, 16, 17, 21, 26,35)
Mercury damages blood vessels, thereby reducing blood supply to the tissues (34)
Amalgam fillings produce electrical currents which are no doubt injurious to health. These currents are measurable in Micro Amps. The Central Nervous System and Brain operate in the range of Nano-Amps, which are 1,000 times less than a Micro Amp (28)
Dissimilar metals in the mouth, such as gold and amalgam, produce higher electrical currents (19, 30)
Brain levels of mercury are in a direct linear proportion to the number of surfaces of amalgam fillings in the mouth (1,19, 25)
Mercury will cause single strand breaks in DNA (41,42)
Mercury levels in the blood can NOT be assessed by blood or urine levels (26)
Dental personnel are severely affected by exposure to mercury (3,13, 49)
(References are at the bottom of this article)
Authorised by the Australasian Society of Oral Medicine and Toxicology.
Phone 61-2-9867 1111
MERCURY IS POISONOUS! MERCURY FILLINGS ARE POISONOUS!
There is NO safe form of mercury in living tissue.
NOTE: Mercury is one component of vaccinations.
Speech to the MS Society by a former MS sufferer
Florida Dental Board Backs Down
Opinion by “Consumer Advocate” Tim Bolen
January 19, 2002
I love it when a plan comes together…
The people of the State of Florida, WERE in imminent danger,until yesterday, January 18, 2001. Not from a terrorist attack,not from a hurricane, but from a source few would suspect – their friendly, neighborhood dentist. And that dentist – held hostage – was going to be forced to cooperate, in what some Health Freedom activists characterize as “the forcing of a known deadly toxin into our bodies”
Everyone in the world knows that MERCURY is a deadly poison, and wreaks havoc with the human body. The problem is so well known in government circles that US Congresswoman Diane Watson, on Monday November 5, 2001 introduced a bill OUTLAWING the use of mercury fillings in the US over a five year period.
But, prior to yesterday, it looked like the Florida Dental Board was taking it’s orders from quackbuster” kingpin, Bobbie Baratz, who recently replaced delicensed MD Stephen Barrett on the quackpot throne. And that would have meant, simply, that Floridians would be forced to accept mercury fillings HAMMERED into the mouths of their children, and loved ones, whether they liked it or not. An apparently corrupt Dental Association was trying to get the Florida Dental Board to pass rules making it illegal to warn patients about the effects of the deadly poison (mercury) that makes up 50% of every (so-called) “silver” dental filling. They were also trying to pass regulations that would allow seizure of licenses of practicing dentists who remove mercury fillings, or advertise to do so. Three new regulations, sponsored by the Florida Dental Association, were on the table in front of the Dental board for discussion. They were introduced last September.
The largest manufacturer of mercury amalgams, I’m told, manufactures in Florida. There has been no investigation, as yet, into whether State appointed Dental Board members, or Dental Association members have any financial, or business relationships with amalgam manufacturers. Maybe it’s time to look…
AND THEN CAME YESTERDAY…
In a two hour meeting before that Dental board health freedom activists from all over North America gathered. They were there to counter the LUDICROUS presentation, asking for the three new regulations, made to the Florida Dental Board, last September, on behalf of the Florida Dental Association, by the buffoon-in-chief himself, National Council Against Health Fraud (NCAHF) President Bobbie Baratz.
There was standing room only.
World renowned experts testified about the dangers of mercury, and the responsibility the Dental Board has to protect the public. For almost two hours, “real experts” countered the DRIVEL previously delivered, in September, to the Florida Board by quackpot Baratz.
Baratz, who was there, was apparently so intimidated he couldn’t speak when it was his turn, at the end of the meeting. The Dental Association representative declined to have Baratz speak at this meeting. They had flown Baratz, who claims he gets $350 per hour as an “expert,” all the way down from Massachusetts. Not to speak?
Maybe the message that the people of California delivered to their own Dental Board, this last year, sank in, in Florida. Californians DUMPED their own board, forcing the formation of a new board, with all new members, after January 1, 2002, because the board acted arrogantly over ONE issue, the posting of mercury amalgam warnings in dental offices. The disbanded board kept insisting that “there is no evidence that mercury amalgams pose a problem.” Californians know better.
Or, maybe it was the fact that the Health Freedom people in Florida, brought their own court reporter, and their own video team, to record the proceedings. But, whatever…
The Florida Dental Board backed down…
THE FLORIDA STRATEGY…
The Florida campaign was WELL designed. It was choreographed from start to finish – and it’s not finished yet. The broad-issue health freedom people jumped in and made an alliance with the dental issue people – an alliance made in heaven. New friends were made.
The goals, and objectives, were well thought out. And, an action plan was initiated and carried through to this point – and it’s not over.
Four major things were accomplished:
(1) Information on the dangers of mercury amalgam were put into the public record – so that it cannot be denied,
(2) information on laws governing what the public needs to be warned about was put into the public record – so that it cannot be denied,
(3) information on the “Florida Health Freedom Bill” and it’s INTENT was formally entered into the public record by the Senate and House sponsors of that legislation – so that it cannot be denied,
(4) information was entered into the public record about the LACK OF CREDIBILITY of Robert S. Baratz MD, DDS, PhD (Bobbie Baratz) President of the NCAHF – so that it cannot be denied.
Of course, the reason they did these things was calculated. Should the Florida Dental Board have continued on their original course, with the information they now had in front of them, they too, like in California, would have been history. That was, and is, the next step, if necessary.
It isn’t necessary – yet.
You don’t mess with the Health Freedom Movement…
1. Sandra Denton MD: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Biocompatibilty 1988
2. EPA Mercury Health Effects Update Health Issue Assessment. Final report 1984 EOA-600/8-84f. USEPA, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment Washington DC 20460
3. Gordon – Pregnancy in Female Dentists – a Mercury hazard. Proceedings of Intl conference on Mercury Hazards in Dental Practice Sept. 2-4 Glasgow 1981
4. Lee L.P. and Dixon Effects of Mercury on spermatogenisis J. Pharmacol Exp Thera 1975: 194(1); 171-181
5. Anonymous – Mercury in Fish – Bull WHO 64(5) : 634 1986
6. Schulein T.M.; Reinhardt J.W. and Chan K.C. Survey of Des Moines area dental offices for Mercury vapour. Iowa Dent. J. 70(1):35-36 1984
7. Jones DW, Sutton EJ and Milner EL Survey of Mercury Vapour in dental offices in Atlantic Canada. . Can. Dent. Assoc. J. 4906:378-395 1983
8. Ochoa R. and Miller RW. Report on independent survey taken of Austin dental offices for Mercury contamination. Texas Dent. J. 100 (1): 6-9, 1983
9. Kantor L. and Woodcock C., Mercury vapour in the dental office – does carpeting make a difference? JADA 103(9):402-407, 1981
10. Skuba A. Survey of Mercury vapour in Manitoba dental offices J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 50(7):517-522, 1984
11. Chop GF and Kaufman EG. Mercury vapour related to manipulation of amalgam and to floor surfaces. Oper. Dent. 8(1): 23-27, 1983
12. Roydhouse RH, Ferg MR and Knox RP. Mercury in dental offices J. Can Dent Assoc 51(2): 156-158, 1985
13. Butler J. Proceedings from the First International Conference of Biocompatibilty. 1988
14. Magnus Nylander, Mercury concentrations in the human brain and kidneys in relation to exposure form dental amalgam fillings, ICBM 1988
15. Svare CW et. al. The effects of dental amalgam on Mercury levels in expired air. J.Dent.Res. 60(9): 1668-1671, 1981
16. Ott K. et. al. Mercury burden due to amalgam fillings, Dtsch. Zahna
17. Abraham J., Svare C., Frank C. The effects of dental amalgam restorations on Blood Mercury levels. J. Dent. Res. 63(1): 71-73, 1984
18. Vimy MJ, Lorscheider FL. Intra oral Mercury released from dental amalgams. J. Dent Res. 64(8): 1069-1071, 1985
19. Matts Hanson. Amalgam hazards in your teeth, Dept of Zoophysiology, University of Lund, Sweden J. Orthomolecular Psychiatry Vol2 No3, Sept 1983
20. Vimy MJ, Takahashi Y., Lorscheider FL. Maternal-Fetal Distribution of Mercury Released from Dental Amalgam Fillings. Dept of Medicine and Medical Physiology, faculty of Medicine and Medical Physiology, faculty of Medicine, Univ of Calgary, Calgary Alberta Canada 1990 published in FASEB
21. Goyer RA. Toxic effects of metals. Cassarett and Doull’s toxicology – The basic science of poisons, ed3, New York, macMillan Publ. Co.
22. Kuhnert P, Kunhert BRR and Erkard P. Comparison of Mercury levels in maternal blood fetal chord blood and placental tissue. Am. J. Obstet and Gynecol., 139:209-212, 1981
23. Kuntz WD. Maternal and chord blood mercury background levels; Longitudinal surveillance. Am J. Obstet and Gynecol. 143:440-443, 1982
24. Brodsky JB. Occupational exposure to Mercury in dentistry and pregnancy outcome. JADA111(11): 779-780, 1985
25. Malmstrom C, Hansson M, Nylander M. Conference on Trace Elements in Health and Disease. Stockholm. May 25 1992
26.Lorscheider & Vimy. The Lancet Vol 337, May 4 1991
27. Matts Hanson. Why is Mercury toxic? Basic chemical and biochemical properties of Mercury / amalgam in relation to biological effects. ICBM conference Colorado 1988
28. Sheppard AR and Eisenbud M., Biological effects of electric and magnetic fields of extremely low frequency. New York university press. 1977
29. Mareck and Hockman. Simulated crevice corrosion experiment for ph and solution chemistry determinations. CORROSION 1974:23, 1000-1006
30. Till et al. Zahnarztl. Welt / reform 1978:87; 1130-1134
31. Langan, Fan, Hoos. The use of Mercury in dentistry: a critical review of the literature. JADA Vol. 115. December 1987, 867 Donated by The ADA
32. Jonnes, Suttow and Milner. Survey of Mercury vapour in dental offices in Atlantic Canada, Canadian Dental Association Journal, 49(6): 378-395, 1983
33. Goyer Toxic effects of metals. Casaret and Doull’s toxicology – the basic science of poisons. Ed3 New York. Macmillan Publishing. 1986 pp 582-609
34. Patrick Stortebecker Formerly Associate Professor of Neurology, Karolinska Instititute, Stockholm. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam – a hazard to the human brain.
35. Hal Huggins. Observations from The Metabolic Fringe. ICBM conf. Collarado 1988
36. Sam Queen; Chronic Mercury Toxicity; New Hope Against an Endemic Disease. 000
37. Mohamed et al. Lazer Light Scatering Study of the Toxic Effects of Methyl Mercury on sperm motility. J. Androl., 7(1): 11-15, 1986
38. Ziff S. and Ziff M. Infertility and birth defects. 1987
39. Inouye M., Murao K, Kajiwara Y, Behavioural and neuropathological effects of prenatal methyl Mercury exposure in mice. Neurobeahv. Toxicol Teratol ., 1985: 7: 227-232
40. Koos et el., Mercury toxicity in pregnant women, fetus and newborn infant. Am J. Obstet and Gynecol., 1976: 126: 390-409
41. Khera et al., Teratogenic and genetic effects of Mercury toxicity . The biochemisty of Mercury in the environment. Nriagu., J.O. Ed Amsterdam Elserier, 503-18, 1979
42. Babich et al., The mediation of mutagenicity and clastogenicity of heavy metals by physiochemical factors. Environ Res., 1985: 157: 221-226
43. Pelletier L et al., In vivo self reactivity of mononuclear cells to T cells and macrophages exposed to Hg Cl 2 Eur. J. Immun., 1985: 460-465
44. Verchaeve L. et al., Comparative in vitro cytogenetic studies in Mercury exposed human lymphocytes. Mutation Res., 1985: 157; 221-226
45. Pelletier L et al., In vivo self reactivity of mononuclear cells to T cells and macrophages exposed to Hg Cl2. Eur. J. Immun., 1985: 460-465
46. Veron et al. Amalgam Dentaires et allergies J. Biol. Buccale., 1986: 14: 83-100
47. Huggins H., Its All In Your Head 1990
48. Stortebecker P. Mercury Poisoning from Dental Amalgam (Bioprob pub. 1985)
49. Amalgam Hazards – an assessment of research. By Irwin Mandel DDS Assoc. Dean for Research School of dental and Oral Surgery Columbia
50. Nylander et al. Fourth international symposium Epidemiology in Occupational Health. Como Italy Sept 1985
51. Methyalation of Mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral Streptococci. Heintz, Edwardson, Derand, Birkhed. Scan. J. Dent. Res. 1983, 91: 150-152
52. Bacterial Growth on Dental Restorative Materials in Mucosal Contact. Orstavic, Arneberg, Valderhaug, Acta Odontol. Scand. 1981, 39: 267-274
53. The Methylation of Mercuric Chloride by Human Intestinal Bacteria. Rowland, Grasso, Davies, Experientia. Basel 1975, 31: 1064-1065
54. Formation of methyl Mercury Compounds from inorganic Mercury by Chlostridium cochlearium. Yamada, Tonomura J, Ferment, Technol 1972 50: 159-166
55. Hanson J, Orthomolecular Psychiatry 1983, 12: 194-201
55a. Amalgam Restorations and Mercury Toxicity. Dr P Sheridan, Masters Thesis, University of Sydney 1991
56. Marxkors R: Korrisionserscheinungen an Amalgamf Ilungen and Deren Auswirkungen auf den Menschlichen Organisums. Das Deutsche Zahn rztebl. 24, 53, 117 and 170, 1970
57. Campbel & M. Godfrey Research into provocation testing of DMPS – urine samples of Mercury
58. Summers AO, Wireman J, Vimy MJ, Iorscheider Fly, Marshal B, Levy SB, Bennet S, Billard L J. of Anti-microbial Agents and Chemotherapy 37(4): 825-34 April 1993
59. Boyd ND, Benediktsson MJ, Vimy DE, Hooper and Lorscheider FL. Mercury from dental “silver” tooth fillings impairs sheep kidney function. Am. J. Physiol. 261 (Regulatory Integrative Comp. Physiol. 30): R1010-R1014, 1991
60. Vera Stejskal, Sweden “Memory lymphocyte immuno-stimulation assay – MLISA”
61. Dr Gustav Drasch, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Munich. Public announcement 25 January 1994 Bio Probe March 1994
62. Dr W. Kostler, President of the Austrian Oncology Society. Paper presented at the World Congress on Cancer. April 1994, Sydney Australia
63. World Health Organisation Criteria 118 1991 Geneva Switzerland
64. Health damage due to exposure to mercury vapour (Mercury) Szkody zdrowotne wywolane narazeniem na pary rteci (Mercury), Moszczynski – P Jr, Moszcynski P, Czas Stomatol, 1989 Apr, 42(4), 233081989 Polish: Poland
65. In vivo mercury and methyl mercury levels in patients at different intervals after amalgam restorations. Fung YK, Molvar MO, Strom A, Schneider NR, Carlson MP. College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln. Northwests-Dent. 1991 May-Jun: 70(3): 23-6
66. Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer’s disease. Thompson CM, MaRkesbery WR, Ehmann WD, Mao YX, Vance. In: Neurotoxicology (1988 Spring) 9(1):1-7
67. A search for longitudinal variations in trace element levels in nails of Alzheimer’s disease patients. Vance DE, Ehmann WD, Markesbery WR. In: Biol Trace Elem Res (1990 Jul-Dec) 26-27: 461-70
DISCLAIMER: The information on this website is not medical science or medical advice. This information is not backed up by scientific evidence. This is just for your information. This information and these products have not been evaluated by the FDA. These products and information are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease, disorder, pain, injury, deformity, or physical or mental condition. Results are not typical. Individual results may vary. Because every person's situation is different , the author of this article will not be held responsible for any negative results which come from reading or acting upon the information in this article. Use at your own risk. We make no medical claims for any products, nor do we sell them or offer them for the treatment for any ailment.
Up to 1/3 of this article may be copied as long as no alterations are made, you mention the author and link to www.Relfe.com
Disclosure: The owner of this website is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon properties including, but not limited to, amazon.com, endless.com, myhabit.com, smallparts.com, or amazonwireless.com.